Shira 3-Jaw Clamp vs Acland® Clamp: What the Evidence Shows

The Shira 3-jaw microvascular clamp holds both vessel ends with a third, adventitia-holding jaw. That keeps the lumen everted, so the back wall can be sutured without flipping the clamp. In a randomised controlled trial of 30 patients (JPRAS, 2023), suturing time was roughly halved compared with Acland® clamps (p<0.001), with the same flap survival. In a trainee study (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2022), backwalling occurred in 0% of anastomoses with the 3-jaw clamp vs 30.8% with Acland® clamps.

Head-to-head results

Outcome Shira 3-jaw clamp Acland® clamp Source
Artery suture time 15.9 min 29.8 min JPRAS 2023 RCT, p<0.001
Vein suture time 16.6 min 33.4 min JPRAS 2023 RCT, p<0.001
Artery clamp time 19.1 min 33.1 min JPRAS 2023 RCT, p<0.001
Vein clamp time 21.5 min 37.1 min JPRAS 2023 RCT, p<0.001
Clamp flipping to reach the back wall Not needed Standard step JPRAS 2023 RCT
Assistant needed 2 of 15 cases 14 of 15 cases JPRAS 2023 RCT, p<0.001
Surgeon-rated ease of use: excellent 60% 6.7% JPRAS 2023 RCT
Flap survival 93.3% 93.3% JPRAS 2023 RCT (no difference)
Backwalling / improper bites (trainees) 0% 30.8% PRS 2022
Clamp flips needed (trainees) 0% 38.5% PRS 2022
Anastomosis time (trainees) 20.8 min 32.3 min PRS 2022, p=0.007

Why the third jaw helps

Design rationale, not a measured outcome:

  • The third jaw holds the adventitia and everts the vessel edge, so each bite passes through the full wall.
  • Both ends are held at an angle facing the surgeon, giving a 360° view without turning the clamp.
  • Closing pressure is spread across three jaws instead of two.

When to use each

Clamp size codes

Clamp size Vessel diameter (mm) Calibrated closing pressure (g)
1A / 1V 0.4–1.0 18–21
2AA / 2VV 0.6–1.5 29–32
3AA / 3VV 1.0–2.25 42–45
HDD 1.5–3.5 76–80
RDD 3.0–4.0 135–145

A = artery, V = vein. All clamps fit the Shira clamp applicator and the clamp sterilization case. See the full range of microvascular clamps.

Frequently asked questions

Is the 3-jaw clamp better than an Acland® clamp?

In a 2023 randomised trial of 30 patients, the Shira 3-jaw clamp roughly halved suturing time compared with Acland® clamps, with the same flap survival, and removed the need to flip the clamp. In a 2022 trainee study, backwalling was 0% with the 3-jaw clamp vs 30.8% with Acland® clamps. Acland® clamps remain the long-established standard, and the trial authors call for larger multicentre studies.

Does Shira make Acland®-type 2-jaw clamps?

Yes. Shira makes classic 2-jaw single clamps (sold in pairs) and 2-jaw clamps with an approximator, in stainless steel and anti-reflective black-coated finishes.

What sizes are available?

Artery and vein clamps in sizes 1, 2 and 3, plus HDD and RDD, for vessels from 0.4 to 4.0 mm. Each size has a calibrated closing pressure, from 18–21 g for size 1 up to 135–145 g for RDD.

Can I sterilise Shira clamps with my other instruments?

Yes. Shira clamps are autoclavable, and a dedicated clamp sterilization case keeps them organised.

Request a quote or sample evaluation →

References

  1. Saha S, Mohammad A, Escandón JM, Chauhan S. Novel Microvascular Clamps to Aid Trainee Surgeon Education: Smarter Than Acland Micro Clamps? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(4):937e–938e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009530. PMID 35960914.
  2. Kohli A, Kala P, Dave A. A novel, innovative clamp with vessel eversion feature for end-to-end microvascular anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(9). doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.068. PMID 35851497.
  3. Kohli A, Dave A, Dixit P, Katrolia D, Kumar P, Kala PC. Efficacy of novel, three jaw adventitia holding microclamps compared to Acland microclamps in patients undergoing end-to-end microvascular anastomosis: A randomized control trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;87:69–77. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.022. PMID 37812846.

Acland® is a registered trademark of S&T AG. Shira Medtech is not affiliated with S&T AG.